Hidden product rules
Make implicit behavior explicit before the next feature depends on it.
I extract the business rules living inside screens, prompts, and one-off handlers so future changes have a stable place to land.
Postcode helps businesses professionalize AI-generated applications: cleaner architecture, stronger types, safer releases, and a lower-risk path forward than starting again from scratch.
Common starting points I help stabilize

Agents are excellent at creating momentum. Postcode supplies the structure, review discipline, and technical judgment needed once the app starts carrying real business value.
Convert generated screens and glue code into typed modules, explicit data contracts, and extension points a senior engineer can reason about.
stabilization/architecture-translation
Route boundaries
inspected, typed, and documented
Domain services
inspected, typed, and documented
Shared utilities
inspected, typed, and documented
Deliverable
Architecture map and prioritized refactor plan
The first version proves demand. The next version needs boundaries, discipline, and the confidence to change important code without restarting the product.
Make implicit behavior explicit before the next feature depends on it.
I extract the business rules living inside screens, prompts, and one-off handlers so future changes have a stable place to land.
Replace repeated agent output with shared, typed utilities.
Duplicate validation, formatting, fetching, and persistence code becomes small reusable modules with useful names and accurate types.
Cover the paths that matter instead of chasing test coverage theater.
I add targeted regression tests, type checks, and review gates around the user journeys and integrations that can damage trust.

Send the repo context, your stack, the next feature you need, and the part of the app that currently feels hardest to change.
Request a quoteArticles on the point where AI-assisted prototypes need clearer architecture, stronger types, and more durable workflows.
A framing piece on the inflection point where AI-assisted iteration stops feeling magical and starts producing brittle, incoherent systems.
How TypeScript, schemas, and explicit interfaces act as durable context for both humans and agents.
Start small with a diagnostic, then invest in the code paths that unblock growth. Pricing is scoped after reviewing the product and repository.
A short technical and product risk review before you commit to a bigger remediation effort.
Fixed scope
Focused remediation for the product paths that make the app risky to sell, operate, or extend.
2-4 weeks
A longer plan for teams that need to keep shipping while replacing fragile generated foundations.
Staged

A few practical answers for teams deciding whether to stabilize, modernize, or rewrite an AI-built app.
No. The goal is to make agents safer by giving them clearer architecture, better repo instructions, typed contracts, and review gates.
Not by default. I start by identifying what is already valuable, then replace brittle pieces only when that is cheaper or safer than stabilizing them.
The best fit is a working web app with real business value, a growing feature backlog, and increasing friction from generated code.
A product summary, stack, repository status, deployment notes, and the next feature or operational risk that made the current app feel limiting.
Yes. The work can be delivered as a focused implementation sprint, technical advisory, or a handoff package for your team to continue.
That is the point. The safest remediation plan preserves working behavior while moving risky pieces behind clearer boundaries.
Most modern TypeScript web stacks are a fit, especially Next.js, React, Node, Postgres, Supabase, Stripe, Clerk, Vercel, and OpenAI-based products.
A focused assessment is usually short and scoped. Stabilization work commonly lands in two to four week slices depending on risk and repo size.
You get a clearer codebase, a risk-ranked roadmap, and guidance on which future tasks are safe for agents versus senior engineering review.